Explain the difference between using ‘should have’ and ‘could have’ for past deductions.
A. The use of ‘should have’ suggests a higher level of certainty or confidence in the deduction, while ‘could have’ suggests a lower level of certainty or confidence.
B. The use of ‘should have’ and ‘could have’ is interchangeable in past deductions.
C. There is no difference between using ‘should have’ and ‘could have’ for past deductions.
D. Using ‘should have’ and ‘could have’ in past deductions depends on the speaker’s mood.
Random Topics:
going toPrepositions Of PlaceIdentify The TensesCan/CouldAdjectives & AdverbsGerunds as Objects of PrepositionsGerundsVerb Tenses and Past ParticiplesFuture TensesVerbs with Prepositions and ConjunctionsOther quiz:
Comma › ViewJim likes carrots fruit and cheese for a snack.
A. Jim likes carrots, fruit, and cheese, for a snack.
B. Jim likes carrots, fruit, and cheese for a snack.
C. Jim likes carrots fruit, and cheese for a snack.
D. No commas needed.
Prepositions of Time & Place › View
Ben spends too much time ____ the internet.
A. at
B. on
C. to
D. in
Grammar › ViewNobody saw them leave
A. They aren` t seen when they left
B. They weren`t seen when they left
Tenses › View
____ he call you everyday
A. do
B. does
C. did
D. is